/*
* Copyright (C) 2007 The Guava Authors
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
/**
* The EventBus allows publish-subscribe-style communication between components
* without requiring the components to explicitly register with one another
* (and thus be aware of each other). It is designed exclusively to replace
* traditional Java in-process event distribution using explicit registration.
* It is <em>not</em> a general-purpose publish-subscribe system, nor is it
* intended for interprocess communication.
*
* <h2>One-Minute Guide</h2>
*
* Converting an existing EventListener-based system to use the EventBus is
* easy.
*
* <h3>For Listeners</h3>
* To listen for a specific flavor of event (say, a CustomerChangeEvent)...
* <ul>
* <li><strong>...in traditional Java events:</strong> implement an interface
* defined with the event — such as CustomerChangeEventListener.</li>
* <li><strong>...with EventBus:</strong> create a method that accepts
* CustomerChangeEvent as its sole argument, and mark it with the
* {@link com.google.common.eventbus.Subscribe} annotation.</li>
* </ul>
*
* <p>To register your listener methods with the event producers...
* <ul>
* <li><strong>...in traditional Java events:</strong> pass your object to each
* producer's {@code registerCustomerChangeEventListener} method. These
* methods are rarely defined in common interfaces, so in addition to
* knowing every possible producer, you must also know its type.</li>
* <li><strong>...with EventBus:</strong> pass your object to the
* {@link com.google.common.eventbus.EventBus#register(Object)} method on an
* EventBus. You'll need to
* make sure that your object shares an EventBus instance with the event
* producers.</li>
* </ul>
*
* <p>To listen for a common event supertype (such as EventObject or Object)...
* <ul>
* <li><strong>...in traditional Java events:</strong> not easy.</li>
* <li><strong>...with EventBus:</strong> events are automatically dispatched to
* listeners of any supertype, allowing listeners for interface types
* or "wildcard listeners" for Object.</li>
* </ul>
*
* <p>To listen for and detect events that were dispatched without listeners...
* <ul>
* <li><strong>...in traditional Java events:</strong> add code to each
* event-dispatching method (perhaps using AOP).</li>
* <li><strong>...with EventBus:</strong> subscribe to {@link
* com.google.common.eventbus.DeadEvent}. The
* EventBus will notify you of any events that were posted but not
* delivered. (Handy for debugging.)</li>
* </ul>
*
* <h3>For Producers</h3>
* To keep track of listeners to your events...
* <ul>
* <li><strong>...in traditional Java events:</strong> write code to manage
* a list of listeners to your object, including synchronization, or use a
* utility class like EventListenerList.</li>
* <li><strong>...with EventBus:</strong> EventBus does this for you.</li>
* </ul>
*
* <p>To dispatch an event to listeners...
* <ul>
* <li><strong>...in traditional Java events:</strong> write a method to
* dispatch events to each event listener, including error isolation and
* (if desired) asynchronicity.</li>
* <li><strong>...with EventBus:</strong> pass the event object to an EventBus's
* {@link com.google.common.eventbus.EventBus#post(Object)} method.</li>
* </ul>
*
* <h2>Glossary</h2>
*
* The EventBus system and code use the following terms to discuss event
* distribution:
* <dl>
* <dt>Event</dt><dd>Any object that may be <em>posted</em> to a bus.</dd>
* <dt>Subscribing</dt><dd>The act of registering a <em>listener</em> with an
* EventBus, so that its <em>handler methods</em> will receive events.</dd>
* <dt>Listener</dt><dd>An object that wishes to receive events, by exposing
* <em>handler methods</em>.</dt>
* <dt>Handler method</dt><dd>A public method that the EventBus should use to
* deliver <em>posted</em> events. Handler methods are marked by the
* {@link com.google.common.eventbus.Subscribe} annotation.</dd>
* <dt>Posting an event</dt><dd>Making the event available to any
* <em>listeners</em> through the EventBus.</dt>
* </dl>
*
* <h2>FAQ</h2>
* <h3>Why must I create my own Event Bus, rather than using a singleton?</h3>
*
* The Event Bus doesn't specify how you use it; there's nothing stopping your
* application from having separate EventBus instances for each component, or
* using separate instances to separate events by context or topic. This also
* makes it trivial to set up and tear down EventBus objects in your tests.
*
* <p>Of course, if you'd like to have a process-wide EventBus singleton,
* there's nothing stopping you from doing it that way. Simply have your
* container (such as Guice) create the EventBus as a singleton at global scope
* (or stash it in a static field, if you're into that sort of thing).
*
* <p>In short, the EventBus is not a singleton because we'd rather not make
* that decision for you. Use it how you like.
*
* <h3>Can I unregister a listener from the Event Bus?</h3>
* Currently, no -- a listener registered with an EventBus instance will
* continue to receive events until the EventBus itself is disposed.
*
* <p>In the apps using EventBus so far, this has not been a problem:
* <ul>
* <li>Most listeners are registered on startup or lazy initialization, and
* persist for the life of the application.
* <li>Scope-specific EventBus instances can handle temporary event
* distribution (e.g. distributing events among request-scoped objects)
* <li>For testing, EventBus instances can be easily created and thrown away,
* removing the need for explicit unregistration.
* </ul>
*
* <h3>Why use an annotation to mark handler methods, rather than requiring the
* listener to implement an interface?</h3>
* We feel that the Event Bus's {@code @Subscribe} annotation conveys your
* intentions just as explicitly as implementing an interface (or perhaps more
* so), while leaving you free to place event handler methods wherever you wish
* and give them intention-revealing names.
*
* <p>Traditional Java Events use a listener interface which typically sports
* only a handful of methods -- typically one. This has a number of
* disadvantages:
* <ul>
* <li>Any one class can only implement a single response to a given event.
* <li>Listener interface methods may conflict.
* <li>The method must be named after the event (e.g. {@code
* handleChangeEvent}), rather than its purpose (e.g. {@code
* recordChangeInJournal}).
* <li>Each event usually has its own interface, without a common parent
* interface for a family of events (e.g. all UI events).
* </ul>
*
* <p>The difficulties in implementing this cleanly has given rise to a pattern,
* particularly common in Swing apps, of using tiny anonymous classes to
* implement event listener interfaces.
*
* <p>Compare these two cases: <pre>
* class ChangeRecorder {
* void setCustomer(Customer cust) {
* cust.addChangeListener(new ChangeListener() {
* void customerChanged(ChangeEvent e) {
* recordChange(e.getChange());
* }
* };
* }
* }
*
* // Class is typically registered by the container.
* class EventBusChangeRecorder {
* @Subscribe void recordCustomerChange(ChangeEvent e) {
* recordChange(e.getChange());
* }
* }</pre>
*
* The intent is actually clearer in the second case: there's less noise code,
* and the event handler has a clear and meaningful name.
*
* <h3>What about a generic {@code Handler<T>} interface?</h3>
* Some have proposed a generic {@code Handler<T>} interface for EventBus
* listeners. This runs into issues with Java's use of type erasure, not to
* mention problems in usability.
*
* <p>Let's say the interface looked something like the following: <pre> {@code
* interface Handler<T> {
* void handleEvent(T event);
* }}</pre>
*
* Due to erasure, no single class can implement a generic interface more than
* once with different type parameters. This is a giant step backwards from
* traditional Java Events, where even if {@code actionPerformed} and {@code
* keyPressed} aren't very meaningful names, at least you can implement both
* methods!
*
* <h3>Doesn't EventBus destroy static typing and eliminate automated
* refactoring support?</h3>
* Some have freaked out about EventBus's {@code register(Object)} and {@code
* post(Object)} methods' use of the {@code Object} type.
*
* <p>{@code Object} is used here for a good reason: the Event Bus library
* places no restrictions on the types of either your event listeners (as in
* {@code register(Object)}) or the events themselves (in {@code post(Object)}).
*
* <p>Event handler methods, on the other hand, must explicitly declare their
* argument type -- the type of event desired (or one of its supertypes). Thus,
* searching for references to an event class will instantly find all handler
* methods for that event, and renaming the type will affect all handler methods
* within view of your IDE (and any code that creates the event).
*
* <p>It's true that you can rename your {@code @Subscribed} event handler
* methods at will; Event Bus will not stop this or do anything to propagate the
* rename because, to Event Bus, the names of your handler methods are
* irrelevant. Test code that calls the methods directly, of course, will be
* affected by your renaming -- but that's what your refactoring tools are for.
*
* <h3>What happens if I {@code register} a listener without any handler
* methods?</h3>
* Nothing at all.
*
* <p>The Event Bus was designed to integrate with containers and module
* systems, with Guice as the prototypical example. In these cases, it's
* convenient to have the container/factory/environment pass <i>every</i>
* created object to an EventBus's {@code register(Object)} method.
*
* <p>This way, any object created by the container/factory/environment can
* hook into the system's event model simply by exposing handler methods.
*
* <h3>What Event Bus problems can be detected at compile time?</h3>
* Any problem that can be unambiguously detected by Java's type system. For
* example, defining a handler method for a nonexistent event type.
*
* <h3>What Event Bus problems can be detected immediately at registration?</h3>
* Immediately upon invoking {@code register(Object)} , the listener being
* registered is checked for the <i>well-formedness</i> of its handler methods.
* Specifically, any methods marked with {@code @Subscribe} must take only a
* single argument.
*
* <p>Any violations of this rule will cause an {@code IllegalArgumentException}
* to be thrown.
*
* <p>(This check could be moved to compile-time using APT, a solution we're
* researching.)
*
* <h3>What Event Bus problems may only be detected later, at runtime?</h3>
* If a component posts events with no registered listeners, it <i>may</i>
* indicate an error (typically an indication that you missed a
* {@code @Subscribe} annotation, or that the listening component is not loaded).
*
* <p>(Note that this is <i>not necessarily</i> indicative of a problem. There
* are many cases where an application will deliberately ignore a posted event,
* particularly if the event is coming from code you don't control.)
*
* <p>To handle such events, register a handler method for the {@code DeadEvent}
* class. Whenever EventBus receives an event with no registered handlers, it
* will turn it into a {@code DeadEvent} and pass it your way -- allowing you to
* log it or otherwise recover.
*
* <h3>How do I test event listeners and their handler methods?</h3>
* Because handler methods on your listener classes are normal methods, you can
* simply call them from your test code to simulate the EventBus.
*/
package com.google.common.eventbus;
|